Assembly Budget Subcommittee Votes to Rescind Fingerprinting Requirement for IHSS Recipients

– Follows Senate Budget Subcommittee Action Last Week .   Law Remains In Force Until Full Legislature and Governor Approve It As Part of 2010-2011 State Budget

CDCAN REPORT #076-2010:   SACRAMENTO, CALIF (CDCAN) [Updated 05/12/2010  02:50 PM  (Pacific Time)] – The Assembly Budget Subcommittee #1 on Health and Human Services, chaired by Assemblymember Wes Chesbro (Democrat – Eureka, 1st Assembly District) voted  4 to 0 this afternoon to rescind the state law passed as part of the 2009-2010 State Budget last July that requires the fingerprinting of all recipients receiving In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS).  Note: the final vote could change if any missing subcommittee members add their votes to the roll call. 

The action was supported by Democrats Chesbro and Assemblymember Jim Beall and also the subcommittee’s two Republican members, Assemblymember Bob Emmerson and Brian Nestande.

The motion by Assemblymember Chesbro would reject the $8.2 million currently in the 2009-2010 State Budget and $5.6 million funding proposed in the 2010-2011 State Budget and any additional associated funding for purposes of fingerprinting IHSS recipients and shift any unspent money into the budget of the Department of Social Services.  Chesbro’s motion would also create corresponding budget related language (referred to as “budget trailer bill”) that would rescind current state law requiring fingerprinting of all IHSS recipients and also state law that requires their fingerprints on all timesheets of their IHSS worker (provider). 

The action follows a similar vote last week by the Senate Budget Subcommittee #3 on Health and Human Services chaired by Sen. Mark Leno (Democrat – San Francisco).

What The Action Means

  • The action by both subcommittees today and last week is not final and still needs approval of the entire State Senate and Assembly -  and then approval of the Governor.  Those approvals will be part of any overall agreement for the 2010-2011 State Budget which, given the enormous budget deficit, will likely be months away. 
  • The action today would rescind or repeal state law – and the funding to implement it – the requirement for mandatory fingerprinting of all recipients who receive IHSS.  The current state law does allow for certain exemptions of the requirement.  However the fingerprinting law still remains in force until final action on this is given by the full Legislature and approved by the Governor as part of the 2010-2011 State Budget.
  • The requirement to fingerprint all IHSS recipients has not been implemented yet by the Department of Social Services – the state agency that oversees the IHSS program statewide, but is proceeding forward as a pilot in certain parts of the state.  If the full Legislature and Governor end up giving final approval of today’s subcommittee action, the effort to move forward on the pilot would end. 
  • The action today did not address and does not impact the fingerprinting and background checks requirements of IHSS workers (providers) that was  passed as part of the 2009-2010 State Budget last July.  Those requirements went into effect on November 1st and is underway now.

Read more stories on this subject

Share and Save:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • email
  • Print
  • Evelyn Blackburn

    What on earth is going on? My caretaker took what little money he had to feed his son and paid approx. $75.00 to have the fingerprinting and background check done. This includes fees that were not even advertised such as transmission fees etc. does he get his money back? What is he matter with this world. I am terrified I’m going to lose my IHSS and my caretaker of 10 years. He will lose his job and his son will suffer, I will suffer. Unbelievable.

  • Richard Roy

    Why is’nt our Union using our dues or some of it to off set the cost of the fingerprinting and background checks?

  • http://www.udwa.org Steve Mehlman

    Rather than using dues money to pay for fingerprinting and background checks, we’ve decided that the money can be better used to fight in the legislature and the courts to save IHSS from further cuts and to repeal the fingerpriting and background check requirements altogether. As you know, we’ve already had success in stopping the governor from slashing provider wages down to minimum wage and throwing more than 100,000 consumers out of the program. Lawsuits and political advocacy aren’t cheap, but hopefully, our efforts will pay off for all of our members and those we serve.

  • stan

    Why should a parent who takes care of her own child and none else, should be give finger prints. It is OK if the provider is going to somebody else’s home and providing services. But why should one give finger prints when taking care of their own child? absurd senseless law by Arnold

  • http://udwa.org Christina

    Also regarding children, are minors going to have to place a fingerprint on timesheets? Are we going to have to go to an office, wait in line, show ID and then put fingerprints on the timesheet? Are fingerprints going to be done at home and possibly get smeared, rendering the timesheet unsubmitable? I don’t see how this is going to save money.

  • Cindy

    I agree with “Stan”, only in my case, I take care of my terminaly ill husband. We have been marries for over 18 years, and I have been his one and only care giver, I am a former Nurse, who quit my Job, to stay home and care for my husband when he got to the point of going on Dialysis and needing 24/7 care. Why should I need to take a background check, and be finger printed when we are married, and it’s our home, and he desperately needs my care around the clock? Arnold has made a mistake, and not taken into consideration that many of us are people takeing care of our own loved ones, so they can remain in their own homes, and not have a sttanger come in and do the same thing I am doing. “Think about it Arnold, how would you feel”?