Schwarzenegger Proposes Up to $750 Million in IHSS Cuts

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed as part of his overall package of budget revisions a cut of up to $750 million in the IHSS program.  This would represent more than 50 percent of the current program budget.  

In his original state budget proposal in January, Schwarzenegger had asked for the elimination of IHSS unless the state received approximately $6.9 billion from the Federal government.  Because this did not happen, some had predicted that he would ask for complete elimination of the program in the May Revise.

Nevertheless, UDW Executive Director Doug Moore vowed that UDW and its allies will fight the proposed cut in the state legislature.  He called upon UDW members to urge their legislators to oppose the IHSS cuts.  

“The governor would rather deprive an elderly Alzheimer’s patient of needed home care than tax oil production like every other oil producing state does,” Moore said  “He’d rather close schools than tax loopholes.  This budget is fiscally irresponsible and morally reprehensible.  Cuts alone will not solve our budget problems.”

The consequences of the latest budget proposal will be immediate, long-lasting, and devastating.  Cutting the IHSS program will endanger hundreds of thousands of seniors and people with disabilities, who will lose the lifeline care that allows them to live safely at home.  In addition, the cuts may mean that  hundreds of thousands of  California caregivers will be thrown out of work,  significantly increasing our state’s unemployment rate.

In addition to the effect on IHSS consumers and providers, independent economists have shown that cutting  IHSS will cost California taxpayers dearly – a recent study by economist Dr. Candace Howes estimated that significantly cutting  home care will result in more than a billion dollars in additional long-term care costs to be borne by California taxpayers.  Furthermore, it will result in the loss of billions in federal funds–the Federal government contributes nearly $3 for every dollar spent by the state on IHSS.

The governor’s proposal stated that the details of the cut would be developed using a stakeholder group and presented to the Legislature by July 1st.   The yet-to-be-named stakeholder group  would be led by officials from the Schwarzenegger Administration. with the Department of Social Services – the state agency that oversees the IHSS program statewide – providing technical assistance.   

The IHSS targeted reduction would actually be $637 million during the 2010-2011 State Budget year – the lower amount due to the temporary increase in federal matching funds due to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).  The reduction or savings target would increase in subsequent state budget years to $750 million when that ARRA temporary funding increase ends.

Share and Save:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • email
  • Print
  • maria salas

    I BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR ALLWAYS GO FOR THE PEOPLE WHO NEED MORE HELPS THEM OTHERS IS A GOOD THING HE IS LIVING BECAUSE I VOTED FOR HIM BUT HE REALLY HAS ATTACK THE SENIORS AND THE PEOPLE WHO REALLY NEED HELP

  • Heidi Prado

    Dear Governor,
    Please don’t gather up all the elderly and infirmed and force them into state run hospitals. Please don’t decide thier lives have no value other than the bottom line. Some where along the line have you forgotten the numbers on your spread sheets represent real people?
    My sister in law did not choose to have brain cancer at age 19. She can’t see, can’t walk, and has no ability to learn a skill due to her brain injury… BUT she knows who her family and friends are, she is able to understand her world as a seven or eight year old child does. She lives, loves, laughs, and she knows she is loved because we care for her and tell her every day. She would know if we put her in a hospital just as much as a seven year old would know it, and she would be terrified, devestated and destroyed. My husband and I both care for her and we work 2 jobs just to try to make ends meet. We can not survive without IHSS.
    If you take IHSS she will have to go into a state hospital and that will kill her. I am not being dramatic it is a reality. She will not survive that separation. Is it not enough that she lost everything when she was nineteen, that she fought to survive so she could be with her family, now she will lose the only thing she has left in the world… her loving home. Please we know your job can’t be an easy one, and we do appreciate IHSS more than anyone will ever know. Please don’t take this away. There has to be a better solution. Please Governor Please.

  • john shindledecker

    Is it the Governors intention to make those who are suffering suffer more? He needs to sit down and read his proposal.It is going to harm so many elderly and disabled people,some to the point of death. How can anyone pass this and be able to sleep at night.Think before you pass this law,it is a killer law! Time to start a law suit…

  • Kathie Clark

    Game of whack-a-mole.

    Cutting these services will drive more people into nursing homes where the costs are higher for the state. I would guess twice as much on average if you subtract those IHSS recipients are not ready for a nursing home care based on level of care needs.

    But then, I am sure the gov is banking on the fact that there are a limited number of nursing home beds – - – then what happens to these people ? He is also probably banking on reduced life expectancy in a nursing home.

    Do the responsible family members have to quit their jobs? Tax rolls go down further. More foreclosures. More people on Medi-Cal.

    Does the family have to call APS on themselves to get the family member into a nursing home when there are not enough available family members to cope with the care needs?

    Do some of these people have to go into board and care homes ? But those slots are limited. Again, state money required to open new facilities. State money required to monitor these facilities. Staffing ratios not good.

    What about increased hospital stays due to poorer care in nursing home or elsewhere. ( Again, much of this paid by the state. )

    Raise taxes darn it. This agenda of trying to make sure those who have the most money get to keep what they have at the expense of those who have very little is absurd.

  • haley burris

    i feel that the governor doesnt know what its like to be poor or even middle class so hes picking on the people who need resources. he probably figures no one will care. i have to stay home with my severlly disabled daughter and i get ihss. it doesnt pay alot and i still pay taxes out of it so the govt is getting paid. although its not a lot i still get to take care of my daughter rather than her being in a home. i will fight in every way to keep my daughter home with me. i know she is getting the care she need.

  • Eric

    If the Governer wants to cut the IHSS Program, Let him get only IHSS pay for Sacramento area for a month & see if he can live off of that. He should be termanated if you know what I mean.

  • Janit

    Before the Governor cuts a critical program such as IHSS he should be required to cut non-critical programs first. The cutting of IHSS will not only endanger the lives of the elderly and the disabled but will also endanger the family member’s and/or siblings of a disabled or elderly person. As a single parent raising 2 son’s, one born with Down Syndrome, if IHSS was removed from my income I could no longer provide the care needed for either of my children. I would be forced to place my disabled child in an institution which would cost the state far more than the subsidized IHSS I receive. Or both my child live on the street with me and collect welfare which would also cost tax payers. These proposed cuts make absolutely no sense as in the long run it will burden California far more. This is an out right draconian action and if the Governor continues to implement these cuts he will be doing California tax payers, the elderly and the disable citizens a great disservice!

  • Inez

    I was referred to IHSS by the CA State Employment Office, and so thankful that such a job that could enable me to care for the needs of my handicapped son whom I love with all of my heart existed. I accepted the job which pays so little and with no retirement benefits because who else could possibly be willing to place the well being of my son above the selfish needs of one’s self, no one. Care for him cost me a fortune, and was hard to find. He would come home with bruises, bite marks, and scratches, and teased relentlessly, where as in my care he is loved and protected.

    The strong, capable, and able should care for those who are weak and need the assistance of others for a safe and happy existence, such as that provided by the In Home Support Service Worker.

    Governor Schwarzenegger should eliminate government waste, but it does not rest in the IHSS Providers. We in fact, save the state money. It costs the state of CA at least 4 times more to place the elderly and the disabled in state run facilities where they are exploited, overly drugged, and die very quickly because they are not viewed as a human being desiring of and deserving of being loved, but only money which the administrators of these facilities become very rich off of.

    Hitler, who everyone knows is an evil monster, viewed the elderly as people to just leave alone, and they would commit suicide, and the mentally and physically disabled he used as guinea pigs to experiment the lethal means by which he would torture millions of innocent people. Heartbreaking just to think about.

    I wonder why it is always the weakest and the most needy that the rich and powerful desire to sacrifice. Are these people, the most needy, and deserving to be loved and cared for, just a reminder of their own selfish greed and conceit.

    It is true, be careful how we treat people on our way up, because we will meet the same people on our way back down.

  • Natasha

    The govenor does not seem to understand that cutting or eliminating the IHSS program does not save money at all. Disabled people on IHSS are all low income, that means they qualify for state care, medical, and other needs. It just shhifts the millions of dollars to board and care, nursing homes, hospitals and other state angencies that cost a lot more. IHSS workers do not get paid a lot-definitely less than the cost of a facility, managers, case workers, RN’s, CNA’s etc… IHSS is the cheaper way, and people get to live in there homes where there loved ones do most of the care for free! The Govenor needs to live the life of a poor disabled person for a few months and try to work the system to obntain the help he needs-then maybe we would get the funding we need and deserve.

  • Anni

    Dear Governor,
    I believe the decision to cut IHSS was a good one I know plenty of people that abused the system all of the disabled that i know aren’t as badly disabled as they say they are and take a cut from the care takers check since they don’t require to much from the care taker! I am sure there are many more cases than just the ones that i know of that do the same exact abuse.

  • http://www.udwa.org Kristine

    Dear Anni,
    I’m sorry that your acquaintances have given you the impression they are taking more than they need from the system. I have had a distinctly opposite experience which is why I feel I need to work with others that support and respect the disabled, the elderly, and their providers. Don’t get me wrong – there will always be some people that take advantage of the system. I don’t wear rose-colored glasses. But believe me, if it happened to you and you suddenly had to depend on another person to get dressed or go to the bathroom you might be surprised at how difficult it is to find help for the small amount of money this program offers. And how quickly your savings disappear. You might even feel angry when someone accuses you of being a fraud.
    Kristine

  • Gail

    Anni,
    You have obviously had very little exposure to individuals needing the IHSS program. Many of these folks are the elderly, who worked their whole life and paid taxes. Do you think someone, who is an adult, with an intellectual level of age five could safely stay home alone and take care of themself? I think you need to meet more clients who are involved in this program. Many of the parents I have met had careers, but had to quit their careers to take care of a loved one that noone else would take care of. Would you sacrafice to take care of your loved ones?

  • mike

    Our Governor, the son of a Nazi browncoat. Does it really matter that he and hitler have the same attitude towards the elderly and disabled????

  • HA

    The govenor doesn’t think about low income or elderley people, he is thinking for his own pocket. It seems like he forget he came to this country with $20 in his pocket.

  • tammy

    i have work for seventeen for IHSS. i DO NOT DO IT FOR THE MONEY,WE ALL KNOW YOU ARE NOT GETTING RICH FROM THIS JOB.i TRULEY LOVE THE PEOPLE I TAKE CARE OF.I TOOK CARE OF A MAN FOR 16 YEARS WHO JUST PASSED.HE HAD NO ONE I WAS IT.SURE HE HAD A FEW NEPHEWS BUT THEY NEVER CAME AROUND EXCEPT WHEN HE PASSED.WHAT HAPPEN IF THIS PROGRAM CUT,TO PEOPLE WHO ONLY HAVE THERE CAREGIVERS .ARE THEY LEFT IN THEIR HOMES JUST TO DIE.THAT IS WHAT GOING TO HAPPEN TO THEM

  • Sharon

    These proposals are clearly “methodically” designed to further inhumanely exploit the elderly and disabled population into to profitable “State Property” the New California Slave Trade”…. Which is in Violation and Fraud against the United States Congress and Federal Government. California procures and takes the “Lions Share of Funding for Medicare/Medical across the Nation.” Obiviously our State Government has the knowledge of how to legally procure these funds from the Federal Government with no questions being asked. The Funds are Managed and Delivered without Accountability. Leaving the State Officials an Open Ticket to profit and exploit the vary same market that allowed them to procure from the Taxpayers of the entire Nation. Under the veil of a “Brilliantly written Trailer Bill.” I challenge every receipient and abled consumer to read the Trailer Bill in its entirety and I believe that we would all give it a standing ovation. Hell I even wanted to stand up and salute it. It brought out the veteran in me. The Benefit/Burden lies in the Lack of Knowledge and Accountabiliy of the Managed Delivery Systems.

    The 14th Amendment was established to protect and provide equity and fairness for disabled, elderly, minorities, women,children and immigrants. We are now commodities and equivalent to the “criminal and prison systems” for profit. We must fight harder on all of the legal issues under our Constitutional Rights. Where is our legal support? A first year law student can even see through this. Every proposal that becomes state law should be fought in the California Judicial System. Amicus Briefs and Injuctions and Motions should be filed expeditiously. On the grounds of violations of Union Members and recipients Federal Rights. We as union members should have the right to know of every law suit pending that our union has filed in court for every violation of our Constituional and State Rights!!! Every case should be posted on the UDW Website. That is why I pay my dues anticipating legal support from the UDW Union… We are being badgered everyday when infact we need “Empowerment” to preserve our Strength as a Union to protect the society that we live in. We are fighting an Army of Sociopaths.

  • http://myactivelife.org Donna Hyder

    This is directed to Anni who wrote that she thinks that there is fraud in the system and it should be cut.
    Anni dear you need to actuall facts before you speak your mind. go to this web site and read what the controler for the state of california reported about fraud.
    http://www.cdcan.us/IHSS/2009-2010/20100201-10IHSS_review_letter.pdf

    This is a letter from the person (John Chiang) who is responsible for providing checks to all California State In Home Support providers. Is there really fraud within the providers in IHSS, yes there is. This letter will show the percent of fraud, and the method used to prevent such fraud from occurring in two different counties. Also what is shown in this letter is the fact that even when the small numbers of fraud cases were found, the IHSS agency did nothing about it.
    Every consumer and every provider in IHSS needs to stop listening to what people tell them and learn how to research out the facts and real information. The Governor of California is not smart enought to do what has been done and the State Government has broken laws and has rewritten laws without the union informing anyone to what those laws are let alone makeing the government accountable. The union is not educating anyone. The union is not calling for any accountability from anyone. The union is not telling the providers what their options truly are. Unless you – the only one who matters – learn facts and find the truth you are being used by the union and you pay them to do that. The shame lies with you. Know your rights, cause the union will not tell you, the government will not tell you and if you want rights – earn them. Any of you ever heard of the County Welfare Directors Association? Well ask yourself this question – WHY. Any of you know what the county’s actual Title XIX usage rate is based on? WHY NOT? This has to do with your pay, how you live. Get yourself educated, learn.

  • Frustrated

    What I wonder is why we only see such one sided comments here? All of the comments I see are either for the program or bad-mouthing someone who is not even though we don’t get to see the “negative” comments. There is not one comment I see that is against this program. What are you trying to hide (fraud maybe) that we are not allowed to see the comments from both sides of this? All comments should be available for everyone to see.

    I also belive the cameras are a great idea. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about right? Oh, that’s right, you do have something to hide, comments to start, what else?

    Also, has anyone who writes these comments gone to school? Let’s learn to spell and use proper grammar if we are going to “fight” for something why don’t we? Good luck saving your ridiculous “program” without a proper education!

  • http://www.udwa.org Kristine

    Dear Frustrated,

    The truth is that our comments are positive because most of our visitors are positive. I am the person that reads and approves comments on the website; and in fact I have never rejected a single comment, stopped publication of any comment, or edited a comment.

    We don’t believe contributors should be judged for their spelling, grammar, or opinions — even when they are “negative.” We do reserve the right to read comments prior to publication in order to prevent obscenities or arguments that get really out of hand, but so far we haven’t had to restrict a single contribution. The whole point of providing a website where visitors can express their thoughts is to build a “community” for care providers and clients that are isolated in their homes. It is through discussion and communication that we resolve differences and build solidarity.

    It has always been my personal opinion that care providers, on the broad average, are good people with exceptional moral integrity. I’m sorry you don’t agree, because how we are viewed matters a great deal.

    Kristine Loomis

  • http://www.udwa.org Steve Mehlman

    1. We do not screen our comments for negativity. If we did, Frustrated’s posting would have never seen the light of day.

    2. Frustrated says spending millions on $5,000 cameras is a “great idea.” Recently, the Sacramento Bee explained why it isn’t:

    “In the welfare realm, fingerprints and photo IDs are used primarily to prevent duplicate fraud, cases in which aid recipients go to different counties and apply for welfare or food stamps under different names. IHSS services are delivered in recipients’ homes. IT’S HARD TO CONCEIVE OF AN ELDERLY, FRAIL OR DISABLED IHSS RECIPIENT TRAVELING FROM SACRAMENTO TO YOLO COUNTY TO APPLY FOR HELP BATHING OR FEEDING HIM OR HERSELF AT TWO DIFFERENT ADDRESSES.”

    But if Frustrated thinks that the 450,000 elderly and disabled Californians on IHSS and those who care for them are all “fraud criminals,” that kind of logic isn’t going to change his or her mind.

  • gail

    Frustrated,

    I think you need a class in emotional intelligence. You obviosly are lacking in the compassion department. Not everyone who decides to sacrifice for their loved ones, or who has a heart to help others is uneducated. You are basically saying that those with education have no compassion?Those with with an education and money have no time to take care of the elderly and disabled?I truly feel sorry for your family members.

  • Julie Belzman

    Governor Schwarzenegger,
    This is the first time I have had an opportunity to write to you and express my heartfelt concern toward your pending cuts. I am the mother and care provider of a sweet and loving daughter who at the age of 26 is literally isolated at home due to her rare and complex medical conditions. She was born with Congenital Hypopituitarism,
    Juvenile onset of Diabetes at age 9.
    Hypotension, Osteoporosis, seizures, and recently diagnosed with Congestive
    HeartFailure. She takes 17 medications.
    I have been a provider for Tammy on this IHSS Program for 18 years when it became evident that she needed home healthcare that I needed to provide. I would have walked away from my job at the time regardless of this program because she is my daughter but IHSS has given me the opportunity to stay home with her and provide the care she deserves, the love she needs from her family and the ability to thrive under a multitude of chronic complications.
    Tammy is to young to have her life so restricted. She is unable to take care of herself and have a normal life at 26 years old. She can not participate in
    any situation without constant medical supervision. This definitely limits her life to Home. It would be devastating for everyone concerned if she were forced to be placed in a lonely medical facility due to budget cuts. She was in the hospital this month for one week. The hospital bill was $52,000.00. I can’t imagine the state providing appropriate care with this kind of expense full time if she were to be placed in a medical facility. I have had a difficult time as it is finding a physician that was not hesitant to take her case and assume care. Such a change would jeopardize her health and her mental well being. I often think of those individuals on this program that do not have an advocate to speak up in their behalf. It saddens me when I know how difficult it can be just to get
    an issue resolved such as necessary prescriptions authorized. I believe in this program even though I have sacrificed my financial future and career goals in order to sustain a decent quality of life at home for my daughter Tamara. Governor, please reconsider your attempts to diminish her from the IHSS Program so that Tammy may continue to cherish what happiness she has and the security of knowing she can be provided the care in her own home

    Sincerely,

    Mother & Daughter

  • Lynda Labine

    I am the mother of a 39 year old autistic woman.She functions at a 2 year old level. She will never live on her own, be able to fix her own meals, bathe by herself, dress herself, she is totally dependent on me to do these things. She is in a Monday-Friday work program for 4 hours a day. I am terrified at the prospect of the budget cuts. There is not a job that can allow me to afford keeping her with me if the budget cuts deep. She is only gone 4 hours a day. She is NOT group home material. I know, I have worked in Autistic programs for years so I know finding a group home that is affordable and loving is near impossible with my daughters behaviors. She will be in harms way. Find it in your hearts to find funding for this valuable program. Not just for me but for others who can’t live without help. With the governors lovely wifes background in Special olympics and special needs programs it is especially galling for the cut backs to effect this valuable program. If the governor were in our position and not someone with normal children without special needs I am sure things would be different. Tax the rich before you remove our only funding for keeping our kids at home. What I am paid is a pittance compared to the cost of putting my daughter in a group home. All I ask is help keeping my girl with me.

    Lynda Labine

  • Noneya

    If the governor thinks it is wise to cut services to people, he has another thing to think about. Thank the Good Lord above he is ineligible to be governor after this next election. I pray we do not get Jerry Brown in there again, we would be in trouble for sure with programs getting chopped, cut, diced and blown away faster than Schwarzzendummy has done.
    I was a caregiver for years and years and lived through Jerry Brown’s term and had lost money because of the voucher program he started. I pray for this program. IF YOU PUT PEOPLE IN CONVELESCENT HOMES, THEY WILL BE IGNORED OR ABUSED WORSE THAN IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN THESE HOMES. IT IS SAD. THEY ARE ALREADY OVER CROWDED AND UNDERSTAFFED, UNDERTRAINED ETC.

  • Carla

    I used to work for Addus Home Health Care for 10 years & there were quite a few clients who committed fraud. Some of them even told me that they didn’t really even need the services or had their families clean their homes for them. So why was I even there? Also, a lot of my clients who were receiving free help bought new furniture, had their homes remodeled, bought new cars or had more money than what people thought. For some reason they got away with it for years. I just get tired of freeloaders. If these people can afford all these nice things that I can’t, than I think they can surely afford to pay more for their services! Also, most of the clients never went by the rules anyway. Maybe it will be a good thing that these home care agencies who give these people free help do close down and the workers will just have to go back to school to get educated so they can get another job. Why work for people who abuse the system?

  • http://www.udwa.org Kristine

    Carla – I think everyone is “tired of freeloaders” as you say and no one wants tax payers to support those that don’t need help. But here is the hard question: what about those that really do need help? Do we brand them as “freeloaders” or “frauds” because of those that do cheat the system? I suppose I am biased, because I talk with people every day that truly need IHSS to survive. Many are elderly Californians that have worked and paid in to the system all their lives and now face institutionalization and/or early death without their IHSS help in the home. What about elderly or disabled people that have abusive families? IHSS gives them a measure of independence to escape those situations.

    Yes, we need to clear out those that are truly cheating the system. But we also need to fight for those that are being CHEATED BY THE SYSTEM through not getting benefits they have worked for and are entitled to.

  • Donald

    To Carla- First of all “Addus Home Care Services” is not (IHSS) In Home Support Services.

    ” Addus” is a privately owned company. Addus is on the stock market and their goal is profit driven. Therefore, you were working for a company that was not IHSS. They are like buying “Blue Cross” or “Kaiser”. The people you were taking care of, were subsidized. Do some research. ADDUS IS NOT IHSS!! ”

    The care providers taking care of people for IHSS are taking care of the poorest of the poor, the most vulnerable people in our society. The people on IHSS have nothing. You worked for 10 years and know nothing about your company? Your confusion from IHSS a safety net for the most vulnerable people in our society should not be confused with a major corporation such as “Addus” which is a profit driven company.

    Shame on you for attacking the people that are working barely above minimum wage taking care of the people society would rather throw away.

  • Michael Tetreault

    Look, the state is in a financial bind and they are looking to cut everywhere. It would be cruel to go after the IHSS program and just say we have to cut because we’re running out of money. So, politicians like GAS come up with this “cutting fraud and abuse” line. If the program is being cut because of massive fraud and abuse, the public is far more willing to go along. What has been demonstrated and what needs to be communicated more effectively is that the fraud and abuse simply does not exist in the manner that GAS says it does. Weeding out the cheaters is a red herring to get those who benefit from the program to turn against one another. It is how conservatives divide and conquer the opposition, so they can immediately turn around and ask for tax cuts for the wealthy and big business. We ALL need to stick together and make them prove what they say about us. Otherwise they will keep dividing and dividing until no one is left to fight. And this isn’t just about IHSS, it is about a host of other issues that working families are concerned about.

  • http://www.udwa.org Kristine

    Donald – Actually ADDUS does provide care for the same low-income IHSS recipients that “Independent Providers” do, and both are paid through the IHSS system. ADDUS is a company – as you said – which does make them different than homecare providers hired and trained by the recipient. ADDUS provides a service for recipients that are too ill or otherwise unable to train their own homecare worker. For those that are able to find and train their own provider, this is usually a much better choice given the personal nature of the service. However for those that cannot, ADDUS provides a valuable alternative. Kristine

  • Cynthia

    I live and work in Riverside County, California. I work for Addus HealthCare and have been with the company for 14 years, holding positions as Home Care Aide, Service Coordinator, and Human Resources Coordinator. I am currently back in the field as HCA.

    Addus is a County Contract Agency. Yes they are a for profit company. And yes they bid for the contract with the county to provide an alternative of providers to the IHSS Independent Provider Program. With the cuts the Governor has made, we have seen many clients who were long time Addus clients go to the IP Program because IP’s “can take them to the grocery stores and anywhere else they wish to go that Addus Rules forbid.”

    Now, while I know there are plenty of providers out there who will take clients grocery shopping and risk the fraud of that act, I am losing clients because I will not. And the rules are there for REASONS. Some of them are for protection of the client, client and provider, provider, and some because of the company’s insurance coverages.

    Ultimately none of this matters to the clients. They want what they want and the IP’s seem better able to give them that, while Addus employees who follow the rules lose hours to other employees who have no problem breaking the rules and committing the fraud.

  • MARIA

    I happen to agree with Donald, addus employees do break rules just as you are trying to say IHSS does. but looking at this point,its the head of governments that are the cheaters with giving themselves outrages raises and benefits while IHSS workers have to go thru all the fingerprinting,orientation, n what else they want to do, then why not the head of government get fingerprint or just come n work a couple of days in the life of a IHSS provider, mayb they will last one day if that. Yes i do agree that we need to weed out the ones that r taking advantage of the system. i have been an IHSS provider for 3 generations now. i just hope they will b around when i need it. we as IHSS providers pay taxes n we must stick together n get to a solution, not punish the elderly n the disabled.

  • disabledadvocacy

    See youtube video “Handling Extreme Self-Injurious Behaviors in Autism” to see a case that warrants at least 24/7 1:1 nursing support for a family dealing with an extraordinary case of autism, epilepsy and brutal, episodic, unpredictable self injurious behaviors.

  • CEE

    I take care of a 47 year old woman 24/7. As it is, I don’t get paid for those hours, just tasks. Ridiculous.
    I cant make a living doing this, I can’t hold another job and she can’t afford to be alone.

  • Outraged

    I am saddened that both of my comments were removed. I will abstain from making further comments except this one. In my last comment I did apologize for coming so strong in reply to the posting of the poster Frustrated.
    I still believe that a program such as IHSS in invaluable program for all parties, the receiver, the State and the Federal Government. I am shore that there may be abuse by some, but many with devastating disabilities and illnesses receive not only the best care but it is also most cost effective for the State and the Federal Government. Those providers that have chosen to sacrifyse their lives for their loved ones or those who choose to provide such work for strangers provide a service that can not be translated in to Dollars and Cents.
    Yes there may be those that will abuse the system, but how about those that have to do the heavy lifting, bating, washing, cleaning cooking shopping, medication and numerous other things, while providing love and care and holding down their own tears. What about those. It takes a tremendous big hart and commitment on the providers side, and the loving and grateful look on the recipients face.
    I will no longer be outraged since it will zip my love and compassion for those in need.