Gov. Brown Expected to Propose Cuts in Medi-Cal, Other Programs.

SACRAMENTO – Gov.Jerry Brown (D)  is expected to propose broad budget cuts that could affect Medi-Cal and nearly all other programs that receive state funding, according to a source familiar with Brown’s proposal, the Sacramento Bee reports.  

California faces an 18-month deficit that is estimated at more than $25 billion. A portion of the shortfall stems from overly optimistic budget assumptions that outgoing Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) and state legislators included in the budget plan for the current fiscal year. The estimated deficit also accounts for an expected imbalance between the amount the state will receive in taxes during the next fiscal year and the amount it would spend under current law.

In his forthcoming budget plan, Brown is expected to propose wide-ranging cuts to nearly all state services, including several health care programs. For example, Brown is expected to call for reductions in Medi-Cal spending by:

  • Limiting visits to physicians;
  • Reducing rates paid to health care providers; and
  • Requiring patients to provide copayments for services.

Brown’s plan also could include changes to Healthy Families, California’s Children’s Health Insurance Program. The changes could eliminate vision benefits and require enrollees to pay higher premiums for care.

In addition, Brown is likely to propose reductions in the number of hours that In-Home Supportive Services workers can care for disabled and elderly residents. The governor also could attempt to divert certain funds from voter-approved accounts that fund mental health care and early childhood development.

Brown’s proposal to cut nearly all state programs could be part of an effort to encourage voters to approve revenue-raising ballot measures in June, according to the Bee.

Such ballot measures could include extensions to temporary income, sales and vehicle taxes that are slated to expire in July. Voters rejected similar initiatives last year.

Read more: http://www.californiahealthline.org/articles/2011/1/3/brown-expected-to-propose-cuts-to-medical-other-programs.aspx#ixzz19zjLlkjs

January 3 Update,   Sacramento Bee article on Budget cuts has some specifies re proposed cuts to IHSS:

“…He would reduce the number of hours In-Home Supportive Service workers could care for elderly and disabled residents. He would also cut domestic services like cleaning and laundry for those whose IHSS caregivers live in the same home as recipients, typically family members…”

Read article: http://www.sacbee.com/budget/index.html

Share and Save:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • email
  • Print
  • Lynda Labine

    Considering the alternative to eliminating IHSS I think a 3.6% cut is more than fair…that amounts to 7.1 hours a month….Governor Brown is stuck with the budget he was given…our previous Governor wanted to wipe us out of existence…Governor Brown is smart and has a heart…I am breathing a sigh of relief…

  • susanna

    Don’t breathe your sigh of relief just yet. It’s my understanding that this article is talking additional cuts to IHSS hours. Yes, we have one cut of 3.6% going into effect Feb. 1, but I think it’s talking about even more cuts specifically to laundry and domestic hours.
    The cut of 3.6% is just a general off the top cut of the total hours. Next come the specific cuts to domestic and laundry hours. I don’t think it will stop just there. Maybe next will be meal prep, etc. I sure hope I am wrong and that there is only one cut of 3.6% to the hours alloted

  • http://roadrunner.com james l.brown

    i think the gov needs to leave things alone and let everything stay the way it is.cause our previous governor did us all wrong and borrowed money he could note pay back to the state and we are still down and i pray that we get out of the hole that the past governor got us in.glad jerry brown is in office.

  • Michael

    I agree with Lynda somewhat. A 3.6% cut is certainly preferable to dismantling the program. The thing is, however, is that we all know that in spite of the 3.6% reduction caregivers are still going to do the work they need to do in order to take care of their client. So basically the state is just taking money away from them, which isn’t much to begin with. Sickening really.

  • http://www.udwa.org Kristine

    Michael is very right, when it comes to relatives or family members keeping their loved ones out of an institution. This becomes a selective tax on those Californians. For those that do not have a family member as a provider and are already struggling to survive without being institutionalized the across-the-board cuts can be literally life threatening.
    Kristine

  • susanna

    Hi Again, I just re-read the news article at the top of this column. It says “Brown expected to Propose to Medi-Cal and other health programs”.
    Arnold’s last budget was the one that gave us the 3.6% cut in hours. Now Brown is looking to cut AGAIN. He said this on January 3, 2011.
    To quote the Sacramento Bee “Brown is looking to reduce (again) the number of hours a IHSS worker would receive” This is a direct quote. Please re-read the above news release and you will see that these are ADDITIONAL cuts to our hours. Brown is looking to also cut the hours required for laundry and domestic services for IHSS workers. Does anyone else see and understand this? This is not the time for us to breathe easy – we are still under attack. We will all lose more hours in addition to the 3.6% cut. We need to stand up to what is right and fight this new attack on our caregiving and hours.

  • http://www.udwa.org Steve Mehlman

    Thanks for your comments, Susanna. We understand completely that as long as there is a budget deficit, IHSS will be a target. UDW opposed the 3.6 percent cut in IHSS last year and we will oppose any cuts to the program in the future. Indeed, by saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars a year and bringing in millions more in Federal matching funds, IHSS is a budget solution, not a budget problem.

    Having said that, the one major difference between Brown and Schwarzenegger is that Brown understands that a cuts only budget will not solve the state’s problems. That’s why he will ask the voters to approve more revenue to help balance the budget.

    Please keep checking back with us for the latest developments.

  • susanna

    Thanks Steve for replying to my post.
    I thought that I was the only one who was worried that the first cut 3.6% in Arnie’s budget of 2010-2011 was not the last cut. Now Brown has unveiled his budget for 2011-2012 and he proposes a budget cut 486 million dollars! That’s is an incredibly bad idea.
    I am afraid that we and the union can oppose all the cuts and it is still going to happen anyway. We seemed to be powerless to stop any cuts. I will be writing and email anyone in Sac’to that I think will listen and asking them to oppose the cuts to IHSS. I will be sure to point out to them how IHSS is a very cost effective program.
    I am sure that there are many bloated beauracies and Boards in Sac’to that should be cut first – not the people who can least afford it.
    Thanks – Susanna