Editorials:


By Dan Morain, Senior editor The Sacramento Bee
Published: Thursday, Dec. 22, 2011 – 12:00 am | Page 11A

The latest initiative to qualify for the 2012 ballot is thick with the earnest rhetoric of white-hat-wearing good government reformers. It’s also dripping with cynicism.

This may come as a shock, but the “Stop Special Interest Money Now Act” won’t do anything of the kind – at least not in any way that is balanced. It certainly won’t prevent one-percenters from getting their two cents in, or their $2 million.

The initiative is the brainchild of Orange County Republicans, was written by a partner in the law firm that represents the California Republican Party, and is being bankrolled by wealthy Republicans.  Read More


THE HERALD’S VIEW, The Monterey County Herald

12/15/2011

Reasonable arguments can be made against each of the “trigger cuts” that Gov. Jerry Brown plans as part of California’s midyear budget balancing act. All will be painful to one segment of the population or another. Effective advocates will lobby to protect most of the programs, and some will be saved for political reasons.

But as the analysis proceeds, state officials need to look beyond politics and to look for false economies—reductions that look good on paper but that actually end up costing the state more.

The most common example, of course, is cutting programs that actually generated additional income from other sources.

A less obvious example is at In-Home Supportive Services, where the governor seeks to save $100 million by making a 20 percent cut in the hours worked by caretakers of some of the state’s most disabled residents—the developmentally disabled, most commonly people with Down syndrome or cerebral palsy.  Read Editorial


Huffington Post Los Angeles, December 6, 2011


Executive Director, UDW Homecare Providers Union

When Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich proposed that students should take over the job of cleaning our schools, he was rightly denounced for wanting to eliminate what he called “stupid” child labor laws.

But not a word has been said about the tens of thousands of low-wage janitors who would lose their jobs under Gingrich’s plan or about what it would mean to their families and to our national and local economies. Read the rest of this entry »


Editorial written by Nancy Becker Kennedy
Submitted to the LA Times.

According to Washington Post and Bloomberg news “IBM’s Benchmark research firm found that online spending was 33 percent higher than the same period last year and was 29.3 percent higher than Black Friday 2011.” Boy brick-and-mortar stores just can’t rake in as much money as all those cyber sales.  Too bad for the IHSS program, and all the other crucial safety net programs, that a lot of those huge sales didn’t generate any taxes for California this year.  It’s really bad when you consider that they’re deciding to make 20% trigger cuts to the In-Home Supportive Services Program (IHSS) and other vital safety net services based on the revenues that are generated by this December.  And what’s really a pity it is that the law depriving our state of the lifeblood they need to keep the safety net intact, these “Amazon taxes” aren’t going to be generated for the state of California until 2012.  Wow if only we had that revenue now!

If you had to kill a bunch of kittens and you really didn’t want to, I guess the easiest way would be to put them all in a bag and beat them with a bat.  Later you could shake out the bag and see which ones survived. That’s a little like what’s happening to seniors and people disabilities, the blind, the poor, the homeless and mentally ill as the lifeboat is getting smaller and cuts are being made. 

I’ll talk about IHSS services program because that’s the program I’m most familiar with.  I was on the committee that wrote the founding ordinance for the Personal Assistance Services Council of Los Angeles County that oversees the in-home supportive services needs of about half of the states 400,000 seniors and persons with disabilities. I’ve served as a board member on it for about 10 years. 

We always knew the program was going to explode when the baby boomers retired. It’s a wildly popular program because it gives people the dignity of living in their own homes when they need help, does so at a fraction of the cost of nursing home care, and because all the government money goes directly into the pockets of the people who care for us. No overhead or profits for agencies. Just the best bang for your buck with all the money going directly to the people who help us. By the way, I am a woman with quadriplegia who broke her neck at age 20, who as been fortunate enough to make a productive contribution to this community for 40 years after breaking my neck.  The only reason I could do that was because of In-Home Supportive Services.  And while I was making my contribution, caregivers too numerous to count, as I look back, avoided homelessness, needing public assistance, or made money to go to college or get their children what they needed.

As we predicted long ago, the program is mushrooming as the demographic ages.  What hasn’t changed is the inestimable value of this remarkably cost-effective way to keep hundreds of thousands of Californians employed, and hundreds of thousands of seniors and people disabilities living dignified and productive lives.  It is a miracle of public policy.

Since the recall of Gray Davis though, the attacks on the IHSS program and its vulnerable recipients have ranged from anxiety provoking to vicious.  People have had armed state

officials making unannounced home visits, frightening some of them and their caregivers so much that some of the caregivers quit working for the senior or person with a disability– who then in turn had the difficult task of finding someone new who wanted to do often backbreaking work for low wages. And then the laws were changed so that these people who did very difficult work had to come up with money for criminal background checks in advance and wait for months for their paychecks.  The seniors and people disabilities and their caregivers were demonized to justify cutting them from the program as frauds and criminals.  One profile in courage during this onslaught was a DPSS Director, Lee Collins of San Luis Obispo County who refused to take fraud prevention money with words to the effect that he didn’t want to frighten a bunch of seniors and people disabilities to give Governor Schwarzenegger cover for cutting the program and that such fraud claims in the absence of data was “trumpeting at a ghost.” 

He predicted correctly.  Since that time, a bunch of seniors and people disabilities have been frightened and have been experiencing waves and waves of assaults on the program, themselves, and their providers.  Changes to the program that make their lives harder, take money that could provide service hours, frighten them with claims that they’re criminals, and put them at the receiving end of political Russian Roulette games with their lives by rules that threaten them with institutionalization every two years or so.  First they wanted to cut some of the people on the program, then others with relatives providing their care with prison records, then take away our laundry and housecleaning. Money was spent to create costly the orientations where they showed alarming movies to our incoming providers we were lucky enough to find and threatening them with jail.  Now we are under the threat of the 20% trigger cuts if revenues don’t reach a certain point by December 15. 

Too bad we won’t be getting those taxes from those cyber sales, and too bad a bill that would have restored former Governor Wilson’s emergency tax brackets to people who made over $400,000 a year never made it through the legislature. And our states Republicans wouldn’t even let the citizens of California vote in if they wanted to continue the modest elevation on sales taxes that expired. 

Governor Brown is looking at realignment of the IHSS program, moving its operation from the county level to the state level.  I guess it makes it easier not to see the people as they’re being dropped from the program.

Last night the wind storm was really scary.  I gave a dollar to a homeless man. I felt scared he’d try to climb in my van. Why not?  The wind scared me inside the safety of my car.  I was pretty despairing because I just read a newspaper article about how many fewer shelters there are than people who need them, now that so many people are out of jobs.  When the wind was blowing so hard, first I thought it was lucky the tents were already removed from Occupy Los Angeles — but then this morning I thought maybe not.  Maybe we should see people when we’re hurting them.  Maybe some of us should be down in Los Angeles so the homeless people who lie in those streets become visible to us.

Or maybe we’ll just keep beating the bag full of kittens with a baseball bat and seeing who survives.  Looking with your eyes open to what you’re doing to people is just too much for some.  Hey, maybe we could offset that prison overcrowding program by having violent felons beat up some of these pesky people in the safety net. Just a modest proposal. Which ever way you hurt people, though, it seems like you should have to look at what you’re doing.

Nancy Becker Kennedy
Mft Hollywood Sunset Free Clinic
Board Member since it’s inception of the Personal Assistance Services


New York Times, November 28, 2011

Something akin to justice may finally be at hand for the nation’s nearly two million home care aides.

It has been four years since the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Evelyn Coke, who then was a 73-year-old home care aide for the elderly who had sued her employer — a for-profit agency — for years of unpaid overtime. No one disputed that Ms. Coke had worked extra hours for no extra pay. But a 1974 regulation defined home care aides as “companions,” like teenage baby sitters, a definition that exempts home care agencies from having to pay the federal minimum wage or time-and-a-half for overtime. Read the rest of this entry »


Press TV, Thu Nov 17, 2011
By Isaac Ontiveros

Photo Credit: Press TV

On Wednesday, California’s Legislative Analyst Office released grim news about the State’s financial health.  The nonpartisan office projects a $13 billion deficit for 2012, and $3.7 billion revenue shortfall that could trigger at least $2 billion in service and program cuts. 

 Hit hardest will be education from kindergartens to colleges, as well as In-Home Support Services and library and Medi-Cal services. Wednesday’s dire forecast also predicts a continued drop in wages and an unemployment rate of over 10%.  Read more


Mercury News Editorial
Posted: 11/16/2011

 

So, Gov. Jerry Brown, what’s the plan now?

The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office on Wednesday released its budget forecast for this year and beyond. The grim bottom line: Revenue for the current fiscal year is projected to fall $3.7 billion short. If the state finance department concurs in its report due next month — a likely scenario — the deficit will trigger at least $2 billion in midyear cuts, including more than $1.3 billion to public education. That would translate to five school furlough days between February and June and the elimination of bus transportation.

Meanwhile, the Legislature remains in recess until early next year. Brown should call lawmakers back into a special session to deal with this calamity.

Plenty of people saw it coming. Economists said the revenue projections for the state budget were wildly optimistic, and several reports earlier this year raised alarm. Yet Brown and Finance Director Ana Matosantos expressed confidence that the midyear trigger wouldn’t need to be pulled.   Read more


Lee Woodruff, Huffington PostNovember 11, 2011

Debbie Schulz

Debbie Schultz, Photo Credit Huffington Post

  On April 19, 2005, Debbie Schulz of Friendswood, Texas, got the call every parent of a service member in Iraq and Afghanistan dreads. Her child had been wounded. When she hung up the phone, in shock, all she knew was that her son was considered to be “VSI”, an acronym that she would later learn meant: “very seriously injured.”

More than 48 hours later Debbie began to learn some of the details. Her beloved eldest son, Steven Schulz, a Lance Corporal in the United States Marine Corps, had been patrolling Fallujah, Iraq when it happened. His unarmored humvee was hit by a roadside bomb, a mortar shell cleverly built into a concrete curb in order to elude detection. Insurgents remotely detonated the device and within the fraction of a second, thousands of pieces of shrapnel penetrated the vehicle. One piece of metal shrapnel flew into Steven’s face near his right eye and lodged in his brain. Doctors told the family that he had sustained a severe traumatic brain injury and devastating damage to his right eye. Steven was paralyzed on his left side, lost most vision in his right eye as well as peripheral vision in his left.  Read More


Millions of families are out of work – or face that threat like never before. However, middle-class jobs are held hostage by Republican leaders – who blocked President Obama’s “American Jobs Act” last week. It’s simply appalling – I can’t think of a better word.

And that’s why we need you to stop what you’re doing right now and call your senators: 1-888-659-9563. Since they said no to the whole bill, President Obama and Democratic leaders are going to put it up for a vote one piece at a time. This week’s vote is on a proposal to send $35 billion in aid to states and communities to rehire teachers, firefighters and police. They need to hear from people like you who are on the frontlines of this crisis.

Here’s what to say:

Hi, I’m __________ from __________. I’m calling today to urge Senator _________ to vote YES on S. 1723. This crucial legislation will help ease the economic tailspin we’re in by proving funding to retain or create 400,000 jobs in education, and for police officers and first responders. This bill will benefit every single American by strengthening our education system and keeping our communities safe. Can I count on Senator _________ to vote YES?

It’s a small first step towards getting our country out of the worst jobs crisis since the Great Depression, and it completely pays for itself with a small tax on millionaires – something that an overwhelming majority of Americans support.

At a time when millions of middle class families can’t find a job – or face losing theirs – it’s time for the Senate to stop playing politics with people’s lives and get America back to work. Please pick up the phone and call your senators right now: 1-888-659-9563.


   By Gerald W. McEntee, President AFSCME International
   Published on the Daily Kos website

On Tuesday, the Majority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives, Congressman Eric Cantor of Virginia, told the press that he would not schedule a vote on President Obama’s American Jobs Bill.  That’s appalling, but not surprising.  With its current leadership, the House never schedules votes on bills to increase employment in the U.S.   If you look closely at their record, you’ll see that putting more people to work is the last thing they want to accomplish.  It would be bad for the billionaires who finance their campaigns, and it would hurt their chances of maintaining power.  

None of the folks on TV news will mention it, but the truth is that the bosses on Wall Street and right-wing talk radio like high unemployment.  It drives down wages and increases profits.  That makes most corporate CEOs happy.  High unemployment delights the Rush Limbaughs of the world, too.  It makes President Obama fail, and that’s been their hope since day one of his presidency.  Remember, it was Limbaugh who told his audience in the earliest days of 2009:  “I want to see him fail.

Read the rest of this entry »


By Doug Moore
UDW Homecare Providers Union

(Urge Gov. Brown to sign SB 930: here is an editable fax to the governor that will not cost you anything and is easy to send using our web-page.)

A state program authorized during the Schwarzenegger Administration would spend nearly $10 million of our tax money to have IHSS homecare providers and their clients put their fingerprints on their timecards. Problem is, these fingerprints cannot legally be used to prove fraud.

Sounds like another example of the kind of “wasteful government spending” and “bureaucracy running amok” that Republicans in the State Senate and Assembly love to preach about. But when the Legislature voted recently to send a bill (SB 930-Evans) to Gov. Brown that would cancel this wasteful program, NOT ONE Republican legislator supported it.

Why? It’s quite simple. Any time the Republicans have the opportunity to show they are “tough on crime,” the facts don’t matter and wasteful spending is perfectly fine.

In 2009, then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger launched an aggressive campaign against what he termed “massive” fraud in the (IHSS) homecare program for low-income elderly and disabled Californians. Flanked by a cadre of ambitious county attorneys, the former governor claimed that the fraud rate in IHSS was at least 25 percent.

That figure was roundly ridiculed and promptly discredited. No study of IHSS has shown the fraud rate to be any more than one or two percent. Any fraud in any government program is wrong and should be investigated and prosecuted, but a fraud rate of one or two percent is hardly an “epidemic.”

Nonetheless, the governor was able to force the State Legislature to appropriate more than $100 million in the 2010-2011 state budget for an IHSS “anti-fraud” program. This included mandatory fingerprinting of all IHSS recipients and providers, unannounced home visits by fraud investigators, and an orientation video for providers that looks more like something from “America’s Most Wanted” than vital information for caregivers.

The problem is that the fingerprints that IHSS consumers and providers are required to place on their timesheets likely are not of sufficient quality to be used for any purpose in the legal system. Indeed, the California Department of Social Services testified that it cannot legally compare timesheet fingerprints to original fingerprints taken by trained technicians.

To its credit, the Brown Administration has said that taxpayer funds should only be used for essential homecare services and has withheld funding for the fingerprinting program.

Despite this, when the Legislature passed SB 930, a bill which would permanently eliminate this ineffective and wasteful practice, every Republican voted no. Because they may have feared that political opponents would brand them as “soft on crime,” they turned a blind eye to the wasteful spending of millions of our tax dollars at a time when we face a serious budget crisis.

Want another example of hypocrisy? When Attorney General Kamala Harris busted the medical laboratory conglomerate Quest Diagnostics earlier this year for illegally overcharging the state’s Medi-Cal program–and the taxpayers–more than $241 MILLION, the reaction from the Republican “fraud-fighters” was dead silence.

As State Assemblymember Bob Blumenfield said: “I don’t understand why they can’t muster the same fervor for going after big white-collar government contractors, and other firms that score lucrative government contracts, whose taxpayer rip-offs dwarf the meager amounts possibly scammed by a few near-minimum wage caregivers….”


By Greg Lucas, California’s Capitol

More than 400,000 low-income elderly Californians who receive in-home care through the state – and their caregivers — will not need to submit fingerprints to receive the services, under legislation on Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk.

The fingerprinting requirement was approved as part of the budget for the fiscal year that ended June 30, ostensibly to combat “fraud” allegedly occurring in delivering In-Home Supportive Services, the fastest growing social program in the state budget.

Combined with other policy changes like criminal background checks on caregivers and more surprise visits to the homes of recipients, the fingerprinting was estimated to help generate some $135 million in general fund savings during the first year of implementation.  Read More »

# # #

Urge Gov. Brown to sign SB 930: here is an editable fax to the governor that will not cost you anything and is easy to send using UDW web-page.


New York Times, Opinion.  August 10, 2011

Five months after Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin pushed through a law stripping public unions of their bargaining rights, the Republican Party has paid a price. Two of the state senators who backed the law were thrown out of office by voters on Tuesday and replaced with Democrats. Mr. Walker’s opponents did not succeed in turning over the Senate, but it was still an impressive response to the governor’s arrogant overreach.

Recall elections are extremely difficult to win; only two had succeeded in the state in the last 80 years. The districts lean Republican, and getting people to turn out in an unusual off-year election is always a struggle. Had Democrats won one more district, they would control the Senate, but they were also trying to send a warning to Republican lawmakers around the country who are trying to break public employee unions. In that, they succeeded.  Read Article


By WARREN E. BUFFETT
New York Times, Published: August 14, 2011

OUR leaders have asked for “shared sacrifice.” But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched.

While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as “carried interest,” thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they’d been long-term investors.  Read Article


By: Lee A. Saunders, Secretary-Treasurer AFSCME
Monday July 25, 2011 Firedoglake

There is no right more precious in our nation than the right of citizens to cast a ballot on Election Day.  That is why generations of Americans have sacrificed and even died in efforts to expand the right to vote.  Yet across the country, powerful corporate interests and the right-wing politicians who do their bidding are working hard to make it more difficult for citizens to vote.  In more than two dozen states this year, bills have been introduced to restrict the right to vote; and in several states where Wall Street-backed Republicans control both houses of the legislature, governors have signed these fundamentally misguided measures into law.

As a result of these cynical attempts to turn back from the progress America has made in expanding voting rights, millions of voters are in for a surprise when they go to the polls.  They will find new requirements that have never before existed, requirements that have been put in place to keep particular voters – students, minorities and senior citizens – from having their voices heard in our democracy. Read the rest of this entry »


By Roger Hernandez

Posted:  San Gabriel Valley Tribune.  Please visit site to to comment.
Roger Hernandez, D-West Covina, represents the 57th Assembly District.

IN November, I will celebrate my 12th year in elected office. No school board experience or city council experience could have prepared me for the difficult budget votes that will affect 30 million lives.Members of the state Legislature put up difficult budget votes in an effort to bring California back in the black, closing the remaining $9.6 billion deficit by approving deeper and more devastating cuts to education and social services. Although Gov. Jerry Brown ultimately vetoed this budget before signing one that made deeper cuts to education last Thursday, the proposal regarding redevelopment agencies shines a bright light on how taxpayer-funded subsidies are being prioritized. Read the rest of this entry »

THE HILL Congress Blog  June 30, 2011
By Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) – 06/30/11 01:09 PM ET

 

This month marks the 12th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Olmstead V. L.C., ruling that the needless institutionalization of people with disabilities is illegal discrimination.  Despite that decision, misguided Medicaid rules continue to force millions of people with disabilities to remain in nursing homes, against their wishes and at a much greater cost to taxpayers than many home and community-based alternatives.  

Today, as we seek ways to reduce budget deficits, we must seize on the opportunity to make our Medicaid dollars go farther while finally giving millions of individuals with disabilities one of the most fundamental of rights: the choice to live independently.  Read the rest of this entry »


Now that Gov. Jerry Brown has vetoed the Democrats' budget, things are even more desperate. While we commend him for pushing back against gimmicks, unless we get agreement on how to increase revenues, we will be looking at an all-cuts budget. Californians simply cannot afford that.

People like Michele Marino will already be paying a high price when we enact the cuts that have been made. A Cal State Long Beach student, Michele is determined to get an education and make a better life for her two sons. Fed up with her abusive partner, Michele decided to leave even though her low-wage job didn't provide enough income. She sought help and began participating in CalWORKS, our state's welfare-to-work program. Now, she also helps other women who want to leave abusive relationships.

Unfortunately, recent cuts to CalWORKS jeopardize Michele's dreams. Instead of receiving $533 per month, Michele would get just $492. That's $42 dollars less, which may not seem like much. But that $42 helps Michele get food on the table and pay for gas that allows her to drop her kids off at school, drive to class and ultimately get off CalWORKS.  Read Article »


Bill better than it was made to sound

OK, I’ll admit to a certain naïveté. I recently read a May 20 article written by Ted Appel, Associated Press, that truly puzzled me.

The headline was: “Evans bill repeals fingerprint program for caregivers.”

Quoting the article, “Lawmakers on Thursday passed SB 930 on a 23-16 party-line vote. The bill by Democratic Sen. Noreen Evans of Santa Rosa now moves to the Assembly.

“In 2009, Schwarzenegger suggested that as many as 25 percent of caregivers in the state’s In-Home Supportive Services program were defrauding taxpayers. The governor signed legislation requiring those caring for seniors and the disabled to provide fingerprints on their timesheets. Evans says the requirement should be repealed because it costs the state money and doesn’t really fight fraud.”

Read letter, Napa Valley Register


 OPINION: THE HERALD'S VIEW,  Monterey County Herald, June 7 2011

 

As part of his attempt to create an impression of frugality, former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger made a target out of one of California's most cost-effective programs, In-Home Supportive Services.

With faint evidence but much hoopla, he declared the program to be tainted by exceptional waste, fraud and abuse. While reassuring his high-rolling buddies that he wouldn't go after their tax breaks, he ordered state officials to crack down on the elderly and disabled Californians who were able to stay in their homes only because of the program.

In a nutshell, it pays the relatives of the elderly and disabled to care for family members in their homes because that's considerably cheaper than nursing homes and because, in many cases, caregivers would otherwise need to collect welfare benefits for themselves in order to afford to stay home with their ailing or aged relatives. Read the rest of this entry »


A state Senate bill tries to stop some harebrained politics from interfering with In-Home Supportive Services program.

June 4, LA Times

Democrats in the Legislature had no choice in recent years but to agree to many of then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s budget demands. Californians had not yet swept away the damaging requirement that the budget be passed by a two-thirds vote, so a few Republicans working with the governor could block action. Billions of dollars in fact had to be cut, and budgets, however outrageously late, had to be adopted. The Democrats had to deal. Read the rest of this entry »


The “silver tsunami,” a demographic flood of aging baby boomers, is poised to wash over the state beginning this year. Sadly but predictably, California is woefully ill-prepared to roll with this wave.

That’s the conclusion of “A Long-Term Strategy for Long-Term Care,” a report issued last month by the state’s Little Hoover Commission.

“California’s long-term care system is broken,” the report states bluntly. “The state has no reliable means of gauging what clients need, what benefits they receive, which services are used by whom, how much each service costs the state and which programs work the best and are the most cost-effective in keeping people in their homes.

  Read Editorial, Sacramento Bee


Published in the Online Monthly Review
by Steve Early

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is not alone in bashing public employees these days.  In the view of his fellow GOP governor, Mitch Daniels from Indiana, a possible presidential candidate next year, collective bargaining has transformed civil servants into “a new privileged class.”  For right-wing Republican governors and legislators, the solution to state and local government budget problems is to strip these “privileged” workers of negotiating rights while cutting their existing pay and benefits.  Meanwhile, in states like Massachusetts and New York, centrist Democrats are also seeking contract concessions and curbs on the scope of bargaining. Read the rest of this entry »


SacBee/Opinions/Editorials
Saturday, April 23, 2011

Should state or local investigators be allowed to make unannounced visits to the homes of disabled elderly and frail people who are receiving government-paid In-Home Supportive Services benefits?
 
A state law approved last year as part of the state budget allows for such visits, but advocates for the disabled are balking at the prospect, with some justification. As they establish protocols for such visits, state health and welfare officials would be wise to heed their concerns.It is indisputable that the In-Home Supportive Services program is uniquely vulnerable to fraud. The employers of IHSS workers are, by definition, frail elderly and/or disabled, so much so that they are unable to perform the basic functions of daily life – such as bathing, dressing cooking and cleaning – without assistance. Read the rest of this entry »

Les Beck is a member of UDW, cares for his sister, Connie, who’s been almost totally blind since she was 18. PHOTO BY STEVE E. MILLER

Down with unions.
Long live unions.

Those two sentiments represent just about all you hear when you turn on the TV news or pick up a newspaper. Whether it’s the battles raging over union rights in Wisconsin or local fire and police unions facing off with the chamber of commerce, it’s easy to fall into the clichés peddled by both sides of the red and blue divide.

While government unions get a lot of press, most others operate out of the public eye; they represent workers that contribute to our lives in ways that are vital to modern life but are rarely acknowledged or even recognized. Read the rest of this entry »